Comments on: Cordwainer Smith on Top 100 or Other Top Lists? http://cordwainer-smith.com/blog/cordwainer-smith-on-top-100-or-other-top-lists.html About his science fiction and his life, run by his daughter Rosana Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:15:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Cordwainersdaughter http://cordwainer-smith.com/blog/cordwainer-smith-on-top-100-or-other-top-lists.html/comment-page-1#comment-2012 Cordwainersdaughter Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:09:41 +0000 http://cordwainer-smith.com/blog/cordwainer-smith-on-top-100-or-other-top-lists.html#comment-2012 Thanks for catching that, Damien! I did fix the post. Thanks for catching that, Damien! I did fix the post.

]]> By: Damien Broderick http://cordwainer-smith.com/blog/cordwainer-smith-on-top-100-or-other-top-lists.html/comment-page-1#comment-2010 Damien Broderick Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:38:20 +0000 http://cordwainer-smith.com/blog/cordwainer-smith-on-top-100-or-other-top-lists.html#comment-2010 It's NOT "rated" or ranked by assessed worth as #46--those books are listed *in order of publication.* I think the way you've presented this url is a bit misleading, and needs to be reworded. "Included on a list" would do. It’s NOT “rated” or ranked by assessed worth as #46–those books are listed *in order of publication.*

I think the way you’ve presented this url is a bit misleading, and needs to be reworded. “Included on a list” would do.

]]> By: Jack Mulcahy http://cordwainer-smith.com/blog/cordwainer-smith-on-top-100-or-other-top-lists.html/comment-page-1#comment-1367 Jack Mulcahy Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:26:23 +0000 http://cordwainer-smith.com/blog/cordwainer-smith-on-top-100-or-other-top-lists.html#comment-1367 Only number 46 on that list? For shame! The only reason I can think why Norstrilia's not in the top 10 is that some voters just may not have understood the author. Which is too bad, really, for he was a once-in-a-lifetime author, with an equally singular mind. Only number 46 on that list? For shame! The only reason I can think why Norstrilia’s not in the top 10 is that some voters just may not have understood the author. Which is too bad, really, for he was a once-in-a-lifetime author, with an equally singular mind.

]]>